Now you’ve known why we call him A CONMAN who has no spirit,no humanity and really immoral. Once i thought Bhutan is the Peaceful Land having a kind and humble King we saw when he came to visit Thailand in 2006 but why this Bhutanese man,Kencho Dukpa,is ungrateful man. It’s only four months since he has been back to Bhutan March 22-July 15. He cut off relationship to this Thai lady regardless her feeling and how much she hurt.
I really don’t understand why he returned her favour in bad ways. He’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing. I think this immoral man is creating problem leading to BAD REPUTATION TO THE KINGDOM OF BHUTAN. For this reason why we need to write his story on this site. Anyway,i’m a Thai people believe that all Bhutanese are different like saying…A full box of apples,there’s some rotten apples but not same all. I hope that and would like everyone who read this story to tell your friend or whom you love and worried to be careful with this such man and one day when my friend,who was cheated by this immoral man,recover from her suffering. I would ask her to this site and let her to release her affliction, to tell all of you how much she hurt and committed by this guy,Kencho Dukpa,working at RNRrc Yusipang where was inaugurated on 3 August.
His ungrateful performance it is called..he is biting the hands that feeds him. Actually,i want to show his picture here but wait…STAY TUNED!

These two, the Symington and Glenn Amendments, were passed in response to Pakistan’s efforts to achieve nuclear weapons capability; but to little avail. Washington’s cool relations with Islamabad soon improved. During the Reagan administration, the US turned a blind eye to Pakistan’s nuclear weapon’s program. In return for Pakistan’s cooperation and assistance in the mujahideen’s war against Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, the Reagan administration awarded Pakistan with the third largest economic and military aid package after Israel and Egypt. Despite the Pressler Amendment, which made US aid contingent upon the Reagan administration’s annual confirmation that Pakistan was not pursuing nuclear weapons capability, Reagan’s “laissez-faire” approach to Pakistan’s nuclear program seriously aided the proliferation issues that we face today.

Not only did Pakistan continue to develop its own nuclear weapons program, but A.Q. Khan was instrumental in proliferating nuclear technology to other countries as well. Further, Pakistan’s progress toward nuclear capability led to India’s return to its own pursuit of nuclear weapons, an endeavor it had given up after its initial test in 1974. In 1998, both countries had tested nuclear weapons. A uranium-based nuclear device in Pakistan; and a plutonium-based device in India
Over the years of America’s on again off again support of Pakistan, Musharraf continues to be skeptical of his American allies. In 2002 he is reported to have told a British official that his “great concern is that one day the United States is going to desert me. They always desert their friends.” Musharraf was referring to Viet Nam, Lebanon, Somalia … etc., etc., etc.,

Taking the war to Pakistan is perhaps the most foolish thing America can do. Obama is not the first to suggest it, and we already have sufficient evidence of the potentially negative repercussions of such an action. On January 13, 2006, the United States launched a missile strike on the village of Damadola, Pakistan. Rather than kill the targeted Ayman al-Zawahiri, al-Qaeda’s deputy leader, the strike instead slaughtered 17 locals. This only served to further weaken the Musharraf government and further destabilize the entire area. In a nuclear state like Pakistan, this was not only unfortunate, it was outright stupid. Pakistan has 160 million Arabs (better than half of the population of the entire Arab world). Pakistan also has the support of China and a nuclear arsenal.

I predict that America’s military action in the Middle East will enter the canons of history alongside Hiroshima, Nagasaki and the Holocaust, in kind if not in degree. The Bush administration’s war on terror marks the age in which America has again crossed a line that many argue should never be crossed. Call it preemption, preventive war, the war on terror, or whatever you like; there is a sense that we have again unleashed a force that, like a boom-a-rang, at some point has to come back to us. The Bush administration argues that American military intervention in the Middle East is purely in self-defense. Others argue that it is pure aggression. The consensus is equally as torn over its impact on international terrorism. Is America truly deterring future terrorists with its actions? Or is it, in fact, aiding the recruitment of more terrorists?

The last thing the United States should do at this point and time is to violate yet another state’s sovereignty.

I am from Nepal and i have a good stock of yarcha gumba. Anyone interested can email me in naveen245@hotmail.com

Thanks

A.shaik saibuddin
Herbal product trader from India
919952084024